Abortion and the Conscience
The word conscience means “to know with.” God has designed the human conscience in such a way as to know right paths from wrong paths. Unfortunately, the wrong path is often the most tempting. “For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it” (Matthew 7:13b).
So what do we do with this conscience of ours when it presents moral restraints that seem to limit our freedom? The first step is that we suppress the truth because of our unrighteous desires (Romans 1:18). This leads to the hardening of our hearts toward moral truth. Our conscience soon becomes defiled and callous.
The next step in this progression is to minimize the seriousness of the moral restraint by changing the terminology identified with the issue at hand. Simply put, we soften the terms from something offensive to something palpable. Here are a few examples:
- Adultery is marital indiscretion
- Pornography is adult entertainment
- Drunkenness is happy hour
- Fornication is living together
The result is that issues once recognized as morally wrong are now accepted and promoted.
While there are many examples, there is no greater modern moral issue where the redefining of terms has led to such a holocaust as abortion. It is not hard to see the searing of the conscience of an individual — or even a nation — on this issue. The social and personal impact of abortion has been diminished over the years by the introduction of less-offensive language. The abortion industry has leveraged vernacular change with such brilliance that what was once seen as horrific and unthinkable is now promoted as normal, even healthy.
Note the clever use of softer terminology by the abortion industry:
It’s a woman’s choice. Sounds good. Who could possibly be opposed to choice? This is our fundamental right and freedom, is it not? However, no one wants to talk about what this choice is about. Is she choosing her clothes for the day? Choosing tea or coffee? Scrambled eggs or fried? Choice seems innocuous enough — until we realize that the stakes are much higher than presented. The word choice is a clever sleight of hand designed to shift our eyes off the real issue — a child’s life. The real choice at hand is whether or not to end the life that God has created in her womb.
I have a right to do what I want with my body. I could not agree with this statement more. To decide whether she wants to exercise or not is certainly her right. But in this case, somehow the body inside of her is left out of the equation. Does she have the right to destroy another body for her convenience? Where do her rights intersect with the rights of that other body, being knit together within her?
We have already seen abortion advocates cleverly shifting the terms once more, asking such questions as, “Well, when does ‘life’ really begin?” And on and on we go. If we found evidence of even one single-celled organism on Mars, headlines would blatantly tout LIFE FOUND ON MARS! Yet the severed conscience of fallen man would still continue to debate about the the complex miracle of life in a mother’s womb. Somehow our thinking has been scrambled.
Let me be clear to say that we are not to hate those who oppose us on this issue. We are to simply bring the truth to the surface, present it lovingly, and allow God to work. Society may try to redefine the terms for us, but for those who follow Christ, let us keep our eyes sharp — and our consciences clear — on the real issues at hand.
I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made (Psalm 139:14).
I have a strongly feminist friend who posted on her FB page something to the effect that the current abortion debate unfairly and solely seemed to center on the actions of women, completely ignoring the culpability of the man. I found myself agreeing w her totally. If abortion is to be effectively countered, the discussion must include the role and responsibilities of men. The discussion must remind us men that we are never excused from our duty to control our urges, yes even in our younger years, and we are never excused from treating women with the dignity they deserve. Here’s the toughest part of the message for men – the only safe sex is that which takes place within the confines of marriage and which is open to the gift of life that could result.
I love and respect this.
I do not want people to have abortions.
How though as Christians will we show that we care for children, the lives of children, the lives of babies and mothers? We’ve done a great job at showing we love and care for the unborn, that is where it stops with us Christians.
What about Syrian babies?
About black babies?
What about healthcare that is killing babies and mothers because it’s not affordable?
What about an education system that favors white upper class people?
What about the millions of children who need to be adopted – we encourage women to put their babies up for adoption but our church nurseries are NOT filled with adopted babies.
What about the babies born to moms in the bad side of town? Where are the black people in the church, the latinos, the Syrians?
Are we showing the world that we as Christians truly are pro-life?
What do we do after those babies are born?
While I am a republican and Christian how can I support a system that does nothing to ensure that humans are taken care of after they are born as well as before? This is the Christian problem. We fight for the lives of the unborn, but we do not fight for the lives after the birth. We will protest in the streets against a baby dying in the womb, but we will happily refuse Syrian refugees because of our collective fear. Would Jesus be afraid? Would Jesus turn a Syrian baby, family, woman, man away? Would he turn away a black family living in poverty?
These are the questions we must ask ourselves.
I’m afraid to the world we look like hypocrites, willing to stand firm in saving the unborn but washing our hands of the blood after.
We can do better.